Skip to content

Accessibility statement

This English version is a translation provided for information. Only the Hungarian text is legally binding: the Hungarian original.

What we have done, what we have not, and where we actually stand. This is a description of the current state, not a certificate of conformity.

Why this statement was written. If an address search cannot be used with a keyboard or a screen reader, that is real exclusion. The structure of this statement follows the European Commission's model statement for the public sector (Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1523); this model is not mandatory for us, we use it as a benchmark. No audit has been carried out by an external expert; what follows is based on our own measurements.

1. Scope of this statement

This statement applies to the pages of the adatka.hu website intended for users: the home page with the address search, the result card and the API access request window, the four service pages, the page for online shops, the API documentation, the “Prices” page and the legal pages, and the English-language version of these pages (/en/), where there is one.

It does not apply to:

2. Legal situation: what is mandatory and what is voluntary

adatka.hu is currently operated by a private individual — not as a sole trader and not through a company — as a free-of-charge beta service. The API is used by developers and organisations; the search on the home page is a demonstration that anyone can try. The assessment below is our own reading; it has not been reviewed by a lawyer. If you think another law also applies to us, please let us know — we will reply as described in section 7.

LawWhat it applies toDoes it apply to us?
Act LXXV of 2018 on the accessibility of the websites and mobile applications of public sector bodies (transposing Directive (EU) 2016/2102) The websites of the state, budgetary bodies, local governments and other public sector bodies (Section 1, Section 2(a)) No. A private individual is not a public sector body. We voluntarily follow the structure of the model statement prescribed for the public sector and the 30-day response deadline under the Act (Section 4(2)).
Act XVII of 2022 on the general rules of compliance with the accessibility requirements for products and services (Aktv.; transposing Directive (EU) 2019/882), from 28 June 2025 Specified services provided to consumers: electronic communications, access to audiovisual media services, passenger transport, consumer banking services, e-books, e-commerce (Section 1(2)) In our reading, no. Our service is not among the services listed: it is not an e-commerce service provided for the purpose of concluding a consumer contract (Section 2, point 11), but a free-of-charge address search and address validation service aimed mainly at developers and organisations. If it nevertheless qualified as such, and the operator counted as an enterprise, the operator would qualify as a microenterprise, since it employs fewer than 10 persons and its annual net turnover and balance sheet total amount to no more than the forint equivalent of EUR 2 million (Section 2, point 28). A microenterprise providing services does not have to comply with the accessibility requirements for services and is exempt from the related obligations laid down in the Act (Section 3(3)). We voluntarily provide the information under Annex 3 of the Act (section 9).
Act CXXV of 2003 on equal treatment and the promotion of equal opportunities (Ebktv.) Among others, anyone who makes an offer to conclude a contract, or invites offers, addressed to persons not specified in advance (Section 5(a)) Yes. We offer the use of the site to anyone on our terms (Terms of service, section 2), and we accept API access requests from anyone. Therefore no one may suffer direct or indirect discrimination from us on grounds of disability or state of health — not even by omission (Section 7(2), Section 8(g) and (h), Section 9). In case of a breach of this, you can turn to the Commissioner for Fundamental Rights or — as a consumer — to the consumer protection authority (section 8).
Act XXVI of 1998 on the rights of persons with disabilities and ensuring their equal opportunities (Fot.) A rule of principle: a person with a disability is entitled to equal opportunities in access to information when using information society services (Section 7(2)) We follow it as a principle. This provision does not lay down any specific obligation or technical requirement; our benchmark is described in section 3.

If the situation changes — for example, if the operator continues the activity as a sole trader or through a company, if the service becomes chargeable, or if we launch a service aimed at consumers — we will repeat the assessment and update this page with a date.

3. Benchmark and compliance status

The benchmark we have voluntarily adopted is WCAG 2.1 level AA (version 2.1 of the W3C's Web Content Accessibility Guidelines, conformance level AA). According to the European standard EN 301 549 V3.2.1 (2021-03), conformance with WCAG 2.1 level AA is equivalent to conformance with clauses 9.1–9.4 of the standard and with the conformance requirements of clause 9.6 (clause 9.0). The reference of this standard was published in the Official Journal of the European Union as a harmonised standard for public sector websites (Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/2048, as amended by Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/1339). For web pages, the standard also contains further, conditional requirements outside clause 9; we have not assessed these separately.

According to the European Commission's list, the reference of the harmonised standard for Directive (EU) 2019/882 had not been published in the Official Journal of the European Union by 2 October 2026. If it is published, we will review the benchmark.

Compliance status: partially compliant. Because of the deficiencies listed in section 5, the website is only partially compliant with WCAG 2.1 level AA. The content listed there is not accessible because of non-compliance with the benchmark: the fix has not yet been completed, and a fix for the contrast of the brand colour is not scheduled (see there). For none of the deficiencies do we invoke a disproportionate burden or the content falling outside the scope of the applicable rules.

4. What we have solved

5. Known deficiencies

We list these rather than keep quiet about them.

What is missingWho is affectedWCAG 2.1Status
No external expert audit and no testing with real assistive technology has taken place Everyone — Not scheduled
The contrast of the white text on the red buttons is 3.7:1 (brand colour, #ef4741) in both appearances, and in the light appearance so is that of red text on a white background; that of all other text is at least 4.5:1, also on hover and in focus People with low vision 1.4.3 (4.5:1) A fix is not scheduled

Accessible alternative. If you run into an obstacle using the search or the API access request window, write to info@adatka.hu: we will also send you the match for the address you are looking for by email, and we accept your access request by email in the same way as one sent through the window. It is enough to write the address you are looking for: do not add a name or any other personal data. Nor do you need to tell us about your disability or state of health.

6. Preparation of this statement

This statement was prepared on 20 September 2026. Last review: 21 October 2026.

Method: self-assessment (the method referred to in Article 3(1)(a) of Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1523). We carried out the checks on 2 October 2026, in the Chromium browser:

On 3 October 2026 we checked in the same way — with the Tab key and in views 320 and 640 pixels wide — the two new legal pages (the Data processing terms and the text of the Terms of service in force from 2 November 2026), as well as the notice shown at the top of the home page.

On the same day, after the fixes, we checked all 13 pages in the Chromium browser with an automated check: on each of them, the first press of Tab gives focus to the “Skip to content” („Ugrás a tartalomra”) link, and each of them has a main region; Tab and Shift+Tab do not lead out of the API access request window; the number of matches and the list messages go into the role="status" region; the selected suggestion is marked by a blue bar. We measured contrast from the colours computed in the browser; this is also how we found the low contrast of the field borders. We fixed this the same day and measured the fix again with the same automated check on every page that has an input field: the contrast between the border and the background behind it is at least 4.2:1.

On 4 October 2026, in the same way, with an automated check in the Chromium browser, we checked the new page for online shops: in views 320 and 640 pixels wide no horizontal scrolling is needed; stepping through with the Tab key, the focus indicator is visible on every focusable element; the first press of Tab gives focus to the “Skip to content” link, the page has a main region, and the heading levels follow one another without skipping. On the same day we tried the header's new “Solutions” („Megoldások”) drop-down menu with the mouse and the keyboard (Enter, Tab, Escape), and checked that the header fits at every width tested between 761 and 1440 pixels; up to a width of 960 pixels the menu items can be reached via the “Menu” („Menü”) button.

On the same day, with the same automated check, we also checked the new API documentation: in views 320 and 640 pixels wide the page does not need to be scrolled horizontally (long lines of code can be scrolled within the code sample's own frame, and this frame can also be reached with the Tab key); in views up to 600 pixels wide the tables are displayed as cards, while in the browser's accessibility tree they remain tables; stepping through with the Tab key, the focus indicator is visible on every focusable element; the first press of Tab gives focus to the “Skip to content” link, the page has a main region, and the heading levels follow one another without skipping; the “Copy” („Másolás”) button of the code samples puts exactly the text of the code sample on the clipboard.

On 20 October 2026, with an automated check in the Chromium browser, we measured on every page of the website — in the light and dark appearance, in views 1280 and 390 pixels wide — the contrast of all visible text against the background behind it, with the pages as loaded (without hover or focus): the colour pairs below 4.5:1 are the brand-coloured buttons and text (section 5); all other text reaches 4.5:1. On the same day we checked the English-language version of the pages in the same way: in views 320 and 640 pixels wide no horizontal scrolling is needed; stepping through with the Tab key, the focus indicator is visible on every focusable element; the first press of Tab gives focus to the “Skip to content” link, and every page has a main region.

On 21 October 2026, in the same way, with an automated check in the Chromium browser, in the light and dark appearance, we also measured the contrast of text on hover and in focus. On every page we pointed the mouse at every visible link and button (in a view 1280 pixels wide; on the home page also in the drop-down menus, the API access request window, the list of suggestions and the result card), and stepped with the Tab key through every focusable element (in views 1280 and 390 pixels wide; also in the API access request window and in the phone menu). In both states the only colour pair below 4.5:1 is the white text on the brand-coloured buttons (section 5). On the same day we tried the header's language switcher and theme button with the keyboard (Tab, Enter, Space) and with the mouse on the Hungarian and English pages, in views 1440 and 390 pixels wide, and the “Sign in” („Belépés”) button in a view 1440 pixels wide (in narrower views it is reached behind “Menu”). We checked that the header of the Hungarian and of the English home page fits at every width tested between 761 and 1440 pixels, and measured the contrast of the field borders in both appearances (section 4).

Not done: an external expert audit, certification, testing with a screen reader, testing with users with disabilities, checking in another browser, and separately trying out the browser's built-in zoom (for example 200%).

We review this statement at least once a year, and also after every change that affects the search, the result card or the structure of the pages.

7. Feedback and contact

If you run into an obstacle, please write to info@adatka.hu. A concrete description — on which page, on what device (computer, phone) and in which browser, and what does not work — is worth more than any self-assessment. You do not need to tell us about your disability or state of health; it is enough to describe what does not work.

At the same address you can also ask us to send you the content of a page — for example the text of the legal pages — in another format that suits you (for example as plain text).

8. Remedies: where you can turn

If you are not satisfied with our reply, or we do not reply within 30 days, the following routes are open to you. Turning to an authority or a court does not require that you write to us first; if you have written, it is worth attaching the correspondence.

An application to an authority and a statement of claim usually also have to state the name and address of the party against whom you are requesting proceedings. We do not publish the operator's name and place of residence on the site, but we will give them to you if, in a message to info@adatka.hu, you indicate that you intend to start administrative or court proceedings, and to the authority or the court if it formally contacts us. The content of the request and the deadline are described in section 9 of the Terms of service (in Hungarian).

For discrimination — the Commissioner for Fundamental Rights

In the event of a breach of the requirement of equal treatment, the Commissioner for Fundamental Rights conducts administrative proceedings upon application (Section 13(1), Section 14(1)(a) Ebktv.). Within the Office of the Commissioner for Fundamental Rights (Alapvető Jogok Biztosának Hivatala), this task is performed by the unit designated for it, the Directorate-General for Equal Treatment (Egyenlő Bánásmódért Felelős Főigazgatóság) (Act CXI of 2011 on the Commissioner for Fundamental Rights, Ajbt., Section 39/M(7)). The former Equal Treatment Authority (Egyenlő Bánásmód Hatóság) ceased to exist on 1 January 2021; its general legal successor is the Commissioner for Fundamental Rights (Section 45/D(1) of the Ajbt.).

AuthorityThe Commissioner for Fundamental Rights
Acting unitOffice of the Commissioner for Fundamental Rights, Directorate-General for Equal Treatment
Registered office1055 Budapest, Falk Miksa utca 9–11.
Postal address1387 Budapest, Pf. 40.
Phone+36 1 475 7129, +36 1 475 7100; toll-free green number: 06 80 215 000
Emailegyenlobanasmod@ajbh.hu (for information; see below)
Webajbh.hu/ebff-kapcsolat

You can submit the application as follows:

An application submitted by email does not start administrative proceedings.

According to the Office's guidance, the application should include:

Worth knowing about the proceedings:

As a consumer — the consumer protection authority

If you are a consumer — you use the site as a natural person, not for business or professional purposes — you may, at your choice, turn to the consumer protection authority instead of the Commissioner for Fundamental Rights over a breach of the requirement of equal treatment: the consumer protection authority also monitors compliance with the requirement of equal treatment in the provision of services (Act CLV of 1997 on consumer protection, Fgytv., Section 45/A(3)(f); Section 15(1) of the Ebktv.). If proceedings have already been started before one of the authorities, the other does not act on the same infringement against you (Section 15(3) of the Ebktv.). The Fgytv. covers the activities of businesses affecting consumers (Section 1(1)); whether we, as a private individual operating a free-of-charge beta service, fall within it is for the authority to decide.

The consumer protection authority also monitors the accessibility of e-commerce services (Government Decree 605/2022 (XII. 28.), Section 1(1)(f)); to enforce the accessibility requirements, a consumer may start proceedings before the authority or before a court (Section 8(6) of the Aktv.). In our reading (section 2), the Aktv. does not apply to us; if you see it differently, you can choose this route as well.

The Budapest and county government offices (fővárosi és vármegyei kormányhivatal) act as the general consumer protection authority (Government Decree 326/2024 (XI. 14.), Section 2). Consumer protection contact details of the government offices: nkfh.gov.hu/hova-fordulhatok.

Court

You can also enforce your claim arising from a breach of the requirement of equal treatment in a lawsuit for the enforcement of personality rights (Section 12 of the Ebktv.); discrimination constitutes a violation of personality rights (Act V of 2013 on the Civil Code, Ptk., Section 2:43(c)). If proceedings are also started before a court in the same matter, the authority suspends its own proceedings until the court case has been decided with final and binding effect (Section 15/B(1) of the Ebktv.).

9. Information about the service (voluntary)

Annex 3 of the Aktv. requires service providers within the scope of the Aktv. to provide the information below. It is not mandatory for us (section 2), but we provide it because it may be useful to our users and clients.

10. What happens to this statement

Whenever one of the listed deficiencies is fixed, this page is updated as well, with a date. If the list gets shorter, it is because we have fixed something — not because we deleted it. We keep the earlier versions. If you need one of them, write to info@adatka.hu stating the date for which you are requesting the text in force, and we will send it to you by email within 8 days.

Prepared: 20 September 2026, based on self-assessment · Amended: 24 September 2026 (the paragraph on the legal situation) · Reviewed: 2 October 2026 (headings, reaching the source window with the keyboard and the mouse, the focus indicator, the list of known deficiencies) · Amended: 3 October 2026 (revised: the scope of the statement, the legal situation, the benchmark and the compliance status, the reason for the deficiencies and the accessible alternative, the method of preparation, feedback, remedies and the description of the service; checks of the new legal pages and of the notice on the home page; the API's automatic description — /docs, /redoc, /openapi.json — discontinued, removed from the exceptions; fixed and removed from the known deficiencies: skip to content and a main region on every page, focus handling of the API access request window, announcements of the list of matches, marking of the selected suggestion, contrast of the empty-field mark; contrast of the field borders: added as a known deficiency that day, then fixed and removed from the list — the borders of the search fields and of the email field have a contrast of at least 4.2:1 even without focus) · Amended: 4 October 2026 (scope of the statement extended: the page for online shops and the API documentation; preparation of the statement: checks of the new pages and of the “Solutions” menu; section 4: scrolling of long lines of code; spelling correction in section 9) · Amended: 20 October 2026 (scope of the statement supplemented with the English-language version of the pages; in section 3: the contrast of the brand colour; in section 4: language marking for both languages and the language switcher in the header, new item: dark appearance; in section 5: the missing dark appearance removed — implemented —, new row on the contrast of the brand-coloured buttons and text; in section 6: the checks of 20 October 2026, the date of the last review; formatting: emphasis removed from running text) · Amended: 21 October 2026 (scope of the statement supplemented with the “Prices” page; in sections 3 and 5: the description of the contrast of the brand colour — a fix is not scheduled; in section 4: the language switcher on the legal pages without a translation, the contrast of the field borders in the dark appearance, the contrast of the dark appearance on hover and in focus; in section 5: the contrast of brand-coloured text by appearance; in section 6: the description of the checks of 20 October 2026 made more precise, the checks of 21 October 2026, the date of the last review)